Summary:
The UK\’s asylum system is facing significant proposed changes, as Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced plans to overhaul how refugee status is granted and maintained. Mahmood described the current system as \”out of control\” and a source of division within communities. A key proposal involves ending the permanent status for refugees, requiring them to reapply for residency every two and a half years. Furthermore, individuals granted asylum could face return to their home countries once those nations are deemed safe, a policy drawing inspiration from Denmark\’s controversial model.
Currently, refugee status in the UK lasts for five years, offering a path to indefinite leave to remain and eventually British citizenship. Under the new proposals, those who arrive in the UK illegally would face a 20-year waiting period before they can apply for permanent settlement, a rule expected to apply only to new arrivals.
Mahmood, herself a child of migrants, defended the policies, emphasizing a \”moral mission\” to address illegal migration, which she believes is \”tearing our country apart.\” She clarified that temporary arrangements, such as the bespoke scheme for Ukrainians, would continue, with an understanding that many wish to return home when safe.
The Home Secretary also highlighted changes to housing and financial support for asylum seekers. Assistance, which previously guaranteed housing, will become discretionary, allowing the government to deny help to those who can work or possess assets. Rules surrounding compliance and consequences for breaking the law will also be tightened, with an expectation for asylum seekers to comply with regulations and work if they are able. These reforms are pitched as the \”most sweeping\” in modern times to restore control and fairness.
The proposals have not been without criticism. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp called them \”very small steps,\” advocating for no illegal immigration and a cap on legal migration. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey expressed concerns that the changes could prevent refugees from contributing to society. Refugee advocacy groups, including the Refugee Council and Freedom from Torture, voiced strong opposition, warning of traumatic consequences for settled individuals and increased misery for survivors of torture and war. They argue that denying family reunion will not deter arrivals but cause more suffering.
The Home Office also revealed plans to use artificial intelligence for age assessment of illegal arrivals, aiming for greater accuracy and cost-effectiveness, although this is likely to raise concerns from human rights organizations regarding potential misclassification of minors.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/16/refugees-established-in-uk-may-have-to-return-if-home-countries-become-safe
